Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 17:45:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: FreeBSD-alpha mailing list <freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: test results for Lynx (AS2100A) Message-ID: <14708.53166.457782.141424@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <200007182151.OAA19240@mass.osd.bsdi.com> References: <14708.43258.138626.9497@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200007182151.OAA19240@mass.osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Smith writes: > > It would be very cool if you could try to boot NetBSD on your 2100A & > > see what happens. > > > > >From what I know of how the interrupt routing works on the 2100, the > > irqs we're seeing are impossible. So they may have changed it on the > > 2100A. > > >From the time I spent reading the Sable/Lynx code in the Linux tree, the > two principal differences were the base address for 'interesting' > register space, and the interrupt layout. I'd be fairly certain that > things are different on the 2100A. > Where did you see a description of the Lynx's interrupt routing??? Which kernel version? Or what patch set? All I see is "PCI Fixup configuration for ALPHA SABLE (2100) - 2100A is different ??" And I've read some comments in the alpha-linux lists saying that lynx isn't supported.. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14708.53166.457782.141424>