Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 25 Jul 1998 23:32:38 -0700
From:      "Joe Read" <joer@triax.com>
To:        <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Rico Pajarola" <pajarola@cybertime.ch>
Subject:   Re: MX CNAME
Message-ID:  <00a301bdb85f$2facce60$c8633ace@paranoia>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>CNAMEs are for human convenience only, they are for your users >who don't
want to type an un-intuitive or complicated canonical >hostname, but for
*you* (the admin) it shouldn't be a problem to point >the MX (or any other
record) directly to the A record that the CNAME >points to. There should
never be any other records pointing to a >CNAME, because it would just make
you do more (or longer) >queries. This RFC rule is to allow the clients to
just use simple >queries.


Until you have a customer paying you about $2000/mo demand you change it so
that any sort of nslookup points only to their domain, not even a simple
little mx record.

Question:

 Can you point an MX directly to an ip?  i.e.:
 ...
                 MX 5 206.58.96.4

Joe


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00a301bdb85f$2facce60$c8633ace>