Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:31:22 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> Cc: bmah@FreeBSD.org, re@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Making GNOME 2 the default for 5.0-RELEASE Message-ID: <200211261731.gAQHVMPe071314@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <1037985350.326.12.camel@gyros> References: <1037907947.309.49.camel@gyros> <200211221637.gAMGb2hE024266@intruder.bmah.org> <1037985350.326.12.camel@gyros>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
If memory serves me right, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> Since I'm not a src committer, I imagine I would need either sobomax or
> someone from re to make the necessary sysinstall and
> print-cdrom-packages.sh changes. Thanks.
OK, as you saw, I did the print-cdrom-packages.sh thing. That was easy.
sysinstall is harder. On, say, a 4.7 system, sysinstall has two
relevant items in the desktop config menu:
GNOME + Sawfish
(Installs gnome and sawfish-gnome)
GNOME + Enlightenment
(Installs gnomecore and enlightenment)
I think that the sawfish-gnome install above is redundant, because
sawfish-gnome is contained in the gnome meta-package, but you get the
idea. We should maybe fix this for 4.8.
Anyways, I imagine what you'd like for 5.0 is something like this:
GNOME 2 + Sawfish
(Installs gnome2, which includes sawfish2-gnome)
GNOME 2 + Enlightenment
(Installs "something" and enlightenment)
The trouble is that I'm not sure what "something" is. I thought at
first it would be analogous to gnomecore for GNOME 2, but I couldn't
figure out what that would be. Should it be gnome2? Or should there
be only one entry for GNOME 2 (which would give the users Sawfish and
Metacity)?
The applicable code, BTW, is in src/usr.sbin/sysinstall/
{config,menus}.c. I haven't made any changes so far to either file.
Testing this is complicated by the fact that at the moment, we don't
have a package build set on bento that contains the gnome2 meta-package,
although I expect that to change in a day or two.
Bruce.
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506
iD8DBQE946/q2MoxcVugUsMRAi2NAKC1lK4zQdquiBco6G8dQ+x6cGXi4QCfWM3X
fLiR0d4NHxH+nODAAsadqZg=
=UPGK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200211261731.gAQHVMPe071314>