Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:05:14 +0100 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, harti@freebsd.org, kip.macy@gmail.com, sparc64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, kmacy@fsmware.com, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 Message-ID: <86ek2iao05.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20060204.121349.06228212.imp@bsdimp.com> (M. Warner Losh's message of "Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:13:49 -0700 (MST)") References: <86bqxntixy.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060204.085134.44793895.imp@bsdimp.com> <b1fa29170602040848p15a21fdibeecbd9ea8d34044@mail.gmail.com> <20060204.121349.06228212.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes: > If things have really changed, then we should change the default and > remove the kludges. My main objection is the mismatch, not the actual > value. Did you remove the kludges in the mk files at netapp to remove > the -fno-strict-alias? Most of the kernel builds fine without -fno-strict-alias. Some parts do not, and the committer responsible for introducing those errors added the kluges you mention to avoid having to fix his code. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ek2iao05.fsf>