Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2) 
Date:      Wed, 29 Nov 2000 21:40:39 -0800 (PST)
From:      Robert Clark <res03db2@gte.net>
To:        brett@lariat.org, dkelly@hiwaay.net, tlambert@primenet.com
Cc:        freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Here is what IBM thinks about using FreeBSD on their newer
Message-ID:  <200011300540.VAA02869@gte.net>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20001129164606.00cfb220@localhost>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail 

If IBM's laptops ship with MS products, the hardware's portion of
the failure rate would be lost in the background noise.

The real question is why IBM is going after the Intel market with 5L,
when Sun has proven that a slow UNIX looks bad when compared with
*BSD and Linux.

Intel+commercial_UNIX=touch_of_death?

[RC]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011300540.VAA02869>