Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:48:08 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> Cc: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Subject: Re: HEADS UP! KSE needs more attention Message-ID: <20040607154808.GA66937@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <40C48BA8.6090005@freebsd.org> References: <40C36D31.4010003@freebsd.org> <20040606193510.GA95886@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> <40C37F3C.1050602@freebsd.org> <20040606211249.GC96607@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> <40C390C4.1000609@freebsd.org> <p06020439bce9548970a4@[128.113.24.47]> <40C48BA8.6090005@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:37:12AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > > One thing to note is that whatever platforms get dropped from tier-1 > status will have a high probablility of not getting updated with the > upcoming binutils/gcc/gdb update that is coming. Logic dictates that the probability should be 0. One cannot reach tier 1 from any tier >1 if binutils, gcc and gdb are not working. Hence, any tier 2 platform must already be supported by binutils, gcc and gdb. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040607154808.GA66937>