Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 15:59:08 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> To: Roelof Osinga <roelof@nisser.com> Cc: "Jason C. Wells" <jcwells@nwlink.com>, cjclark@alum.mit.edu, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Language for Modeling Mechanical System Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1000727155107.98205E-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> In-Reply-To: <397F4DDC.9A5A4D6F@nisser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Roelof Osinga wrote: > "Jason C. Wells" wrote: > > > > On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Crist J. Clark wrote: > > > > > It's what FORTRAN (FORmula TRANslation) was made for. > > > > Ughh! I haven't heard much good about Fortran. To be fair, I have never > > looked at it. I hear that the syntax is _very_ terse. I will take a closer > > look at it. > > Nope. That would be APL. Nothing wrong with Fortran. The versions > after IV are quite nice, actually. At least, from what I've seen and > read about them. Haven't used Fortran after IV. The GNU has a > F77 translator. Turns F77 into C. > GNU has f2c? I'm pretty sure f2c is independent of GNU. > But something like MathCalc would probably be more efficient. > Especially when there are lots of models available. > > Roelof > > -- > Home is where the (@) http://eboa.com/ is. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.1000727155107.98205E-100000>