Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:11:16 GMT From: Paolo Pisati <piso@FreeBSD.org> To: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: PERFORCE change 102139 for review Message-ID: <200607221211.k6MCBGAM032342@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=102139 Change 102139 by piso@piso_longino on 2006/07/22 12:10:36 Use IF_FAST macro instead of testing for INTR_FAST in flags. Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/soc2006/intr_filter/sparc64/sparc64/intr_machdep.c#6 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/soc2006/intr_filter/sparc64/sparc64/intr_machdep.c#6 (text+ko) ==== @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ * instead from intr_execute_handlers: with interrupt filters in * place, they won't work, to be fixed. */ - intr_setup(flags & INTR_FAST ? PIL_FAST : PIL_ITHREAD, intr_fast, vec, + intr_setup(IS_FAST(filter, handler) ? PIL_FAST : PIL_ITHREAD, intr_fast, vec, intr_execute_handlers, iv); intr_stray_count[vec] = 0;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200607221211.k6MCBGAM032342>