Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:31:26 +0100 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@fnop.net> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Cc: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>, Krassimir Slavchev <krassi@bulinfo.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: network problems? Message-ID: <86k5w67shd.wl%rpaulo@fnop.net> In-Reply-To: <4628A6A0.40102@freebsd.org> References: <46272B99.9090100@bulinfo.net> <20070419223759.GA4051@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <462868FF.2050008@bulinfo.net> <4628A6A0.40102@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:40:16 +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > 7-current uses larger receive windows with a higher scaling factor. > If your firewall doesn't correctly track that you get the problem > you are describing. In pf based firewalls it is a common thing to > misplace the keep-state rule. I have another problem. I'm trying to talk to a host (MontaVista Linux based router/AP) that is on the same network segment. If rfc1323 is on, I can't browse the router's webpage: after a few bytes transfered, I only seep TCP keep alive packets. But a telnet connection works well. If I disable rfc1323, everything works as expected. Maybe this is related to PAWS, but I don't the router at hand. If you need a tcpdump, I can only give it to you during the upcoming week.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86k5w67shd.wl%rpaulo>