Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:57:26 -0700 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: New FreeBSD Logo Message-ID: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNKEONFDAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> In-Reply-To: <C6AFADD3-47FA-4245-B258-C53EE749E0D9@shire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>-----Original Message----- >From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [mailto:chad@shire.net] >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:31 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List >Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo > > >Wow, Ted a top-poster! Why not, no point making everyone reread the entire argument all over again, I'm sure most people on the list have seen it an enormous number of times already. > >A professional evaluation of "beastie" showed he was not a logo and >had served as a poor-one at that in his ersatz role as a wanna-be >logo. (Note that I did not say that Beastie was poor but that he >had served as a poor logo based on professional criteria of what >makes a good logo). So, we traded in Beastie, a difficult and expensive to print logo that lost most resolution when shrunk down, for a difficult and expensive to print logo that loses most resolution when shrunk down. Ah, this is progress. Kind of like the automobile companies do, when they replace last years difficult and expensive to service model because everything is jammed into a too small engine bay, with this years difficult and expensive to service model because everything is jammed into a too small engine bay. I got it now! Ted
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNKEONFDAA.tedm>