Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:58:05 -0700 From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No more floppy drive Message-ID: <41335C9D.7040204@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20040830.104723.66164724.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <412D1CE6.3050603@root.org> <20040825.171523.10602123.imp@bsdimp.com> <41335688.1060805@root.org> <20040830.104723.66164724.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <41335688.1060805@root.org> > Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes: > : Basically, systems that have AML that claim 0x3f2-0x3f5,0x3f7 are > : correct and we need to only allocate those ports. In fact, we shouldn't > : allocate 0x3f0-0x3f1 unless on a PS/2 system. However, our floppy code > : assumes a base of 0x3f0 and that's why people report error messages like: > > Yes. That's right. I've understood that from early in the > conversations. However, we don't have much of a choice for systems > that tell us 0x3f0-0x3f5, which is what the traditional range for > these ports really is. This is a very recent development, and needs > some tcl to get right. I have some patches in the works, but they > aren't ready yet. Please be patient. Ok, glad you knew this. Thanks for working on it. -- Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41335C9D.7040204>