Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:14:31 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc pccard_ether Message-ID: <20050928201431.GA18560@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <ygey85hgdgh.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> References: <200509281959.j8SJxIpD046472@repoman.freebsd.org> <ygey85hgdgh.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 05:11:10AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > > >>>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:59:18 +0000 (UTC) > >>>>> Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> said: > > brooks> Modified files: > brooks> etc pccard_ether > brooks> Log: > brooks> Be less IPv4 centric. When checking if the interface is already > brooks> configured, check if the UP flag is set instead of checking for the > brooks> netmask keyword. > > Umm, it means we cannot use pccard_ether for already upped interface, > anymore. :( That's correct. What is the specific use case you are concerned about? -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDOvmmXY6L6fI4GtQRAiKPAKDTuDyJHg8faqvjb9upXc8HRJdG+QCeKGbB RxnN9cNIaUjt4d+68IKgxZI= =eZiY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050928201431.GA18560>