Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 20:42:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpthread version bump Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0504222039430.26084-100000@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <426985CA.30003@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, David Xu wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: > > >On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Daniel Eischen wrote: > >>> > >>I worked up a quick patch. It compiles, but it will be some time > >>before I can try it. > >> > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/kse/libpthread.diffs > >> > >> > > > >Note that I also slightly prefer #2, since you would have to make > >the #pragma weak hacks to both libpthread and libthr. > > > > I won't support LDT based TLS, so you don't have to patch it. If there are applications linked to libthr and libc.so.5 (in 5.x) you have the same problem. If you aren't going to support LDT, then you should bump the library version (unless we do #2). -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.43.0504222039430.26084-100000>