Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:15:20 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 229885] benchmarks/stress-ng isn't broken on i386, something else is. Message-ID: <bug-229885-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D229885 Bug ID: 229885 Summary: benchmarks/stress-ng isn't broken on i386, something else is. Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: i386 OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: pizzamig@freebsd.org Reporter: dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au Assignee: pizzamig@freebsd.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(pizzamig@freebsd.org) I last built stress-ng-0.09.27.txz on i386 on 30th May on a FreeBSD 11.1Sta= ble which was built around late April.=20=20 After upgrading to latest 11.2Stable with clang 6.0.1 and rebuilding stress= -ng 0.09.33 I obtain lots of messages like stress-atomic.c:(.text+0x467): undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_sub_8' which is why the maintainer marked this port as broken in the Makefile. So I went hunting, as I'm experiencing quite a few other ports problems. I switched into a revert/build cycle and attempted to rebuild back to 0.09.23= .=20 All experienced the same failure. So... the problem isn't with stress-ng. I've found that its quickest to simply force the build with gcc7, which in = this case easily rebuilt stress-ng 0.09.23 AND stress-ng-0.09.33. I suspect clang 6.0.X so I need to revert clang from 6.0.1 back to 5.0.0; b= ut without reverting the buildworld as it would be preferable to establish that other libraries (or the kernel) weren't the issue. But how? stress-ng 0.09.33 built and ran cleanly on amd64 under clang 6.0.1 Aside and incidentally, other ports that I had to modify build attributes f= or=20 were: textproc/htdig sysutils/npadmin net/isc-dhcp44-* on both i386 & amd64= .=20 security/openssh-portable has only had a flavored enhancement but building = has proven intractable in our environ, we enable one option BSM... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-229885-7788>