Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:15:35 +0100 From: Bruno Afonso <brunomiguel@dequim.ist.utl.pt> To: Panagiotis Astithas <past@netmode.ntua.gr> Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.1-CURRENT: libkse / libthr and SCHED_4BSD / SCHED_ULE Message-ID: <3F1D38F7.60305@dequim.ist.utl.pt> In-Reply-To: <3F1D36E1.5000400@netmode.ntua.gr> References: <20030722113017.GF863@starjuice.net> <3F1D2F7C.4030506@dequim.ist.utl.pt> <20030722124353.GI863@starjuice.net> <3F1D36E1.5000400@netmode.ntua.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Panagiotis Astithas wrote: > Sheldon Hearn wrote: > >> On (2003/07/22 13:35), Bruno Afonso wrote: >> >> >>>> I'm just wondering whether anyone's had any joy with Java and the >>>> alternative thread support emerging in -CURRENT. >>> >>> >>> I don't think it's supposed to even work at the moment. I've been >>> using java 1.4.1 for development but until I set up libmap.conf to >>> use libc_r I always got into trouble :) >> >> >> >> Interesting. I've just tried IntelliJ IDEA 3.0 with both libkse and >> libthr, and haven't had any weirdness for pretty big builds. >> >> If nobody else has any timing info, I'll do some serious timing of a few >> ant builds. The project I'm working on makes use of parallelism in the >> build, so it'll be a decent test. >> >> Ciao, >> Sheldon. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Alexey Zelkin reported relative success using libkse in freebsd-threads > last month. I think he had trouble with libthr though. The archives > should be fairly informative. This is probably with extra patches he has been developing, not the ones used in the ports tree :-) -- Bruno Miguel Afonso
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F1D38F7.60305>