Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:21:01 +0000 From: Joseph Mallett <jmallett@NewGold.NET> To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>, "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/ftp fetch.c Message-ID: <20010830202101.A80988@NewGold.NET> In-Reply-To: <20010830111500.D95141@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20010830130536.A75112@NewGold.NET>; <20010830132612.4952B3E2F@bazooka.unixfreak.org> <20010830133920.A75950@NewGold.NET> <20010830111500.D95141@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 11:15:00AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 01:39:20PM +0000, Joseph Mallett wrote: > > And importing lukemftp again (as a lot of people seem to want) will just > > bring in more duplicated code as far as protocol support, etc. > > > > I see no reason it could not be modifyed to use fetch(3) in some > > circumstances, > > By this single statement it is clear you are missing the point. We do > NOT want to modify it. It is in src/contrib on a vendor branch. This > means we accept it as it is. Sorry, I don't think I was clear, I could be mistaken, but I believe when I was talking about using fetch(3), I was referring to "real ftp(1)" or however you differentiate. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010830202101.A80988>