Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 11:34:15 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r221703 - in head/sys: amd64/include i386/include x86/isa x86/x86 Message-ID: <4DCF9007.7010606@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110514041838.S2545@besplex.bde.org> References: <201105091734.p49HY0P3006180@svn.freebsd.org> <201105121239.31340.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4DCD2875.9040808@FreeBSD.org> <201105131257.34009.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20110514041838.S2545@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 13/05/2011 22:14 Bruce Evans said the following: > It might happen for clock_gettime() > in separate threads where the threads somehow know and depend on the > order of the calls. My simplistic world view is that those threads then should be the place to do all the fence dances, not the generic tsc read function. But, hey, I am speaking beyond my knowledge of their code and situation. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DCF9007.7010606>