Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 23:21:45 +0200 (SAT) From: John Hay <jhay@icomtek.csir.co.za> To: tlambert2@mindspring.com (Terry Lambert) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: netns Message-ID: <200209222121.g8MLLkOT033782@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> In-Reply-To: <3D8E2F5C.48B92F70@mindspring.com> from Terry Lambert at "Sep 22, 2002 02:00:12 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> John Hay wrote: > > Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx. > > IPX is based on XNS. It differs by one significant field. The > SAP (Service Advertisement Protocol) in IPX comed directly from > XNS. So you are agreeing with me that to use netns to do ipx when we have netipx does not make sense? :-) > FWIW. I know, a lot of my time went into netipx, which was derived from netns. I also did IPXrouted which does SAP too. John -- John Hay -- John.Hay@icomtek.csir.co.za / jhay@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200209222121.g8MLLkOT033782>