Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 12:55:00 -0500 (EST) From: Rob Simmons <rsimmons@wlcg.com> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: SSHD revelaing too much information. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0103271233160.10105-100000@mail.wlcg.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010327121329.81313P-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Robert Watson wrote: > An important first step would be to introduce the required run-time option > into OpenSSH, and get that change accepted back by various maintainers of > the software (OpenBSD, and the portable distribution). We already have a > maintenance load problem due to increased divergence from the base > distribution (introducing PAM, et al, into the OpenBSD distribution > increases maintenance costs substantially), and we need to not make that > problem worse, or risk creating larger problems than are solved through > the new feature. The portable version of OpenSSH, 2.5.2p2 has good support for PAM now. I have compiled it for x86 Solaris and it works great. I had asked a little bit ago about the plans to move to the 2.5 branch of OpenSSH and the general sentiment was that a couple of things were still broken in that branch, such as TIS. I took a look at the changelog and I don't see anything about TIS being fixed, nor do I see anything in the TODO about fixing it. Are there any more problems with 2.5 before moving it into STABLE? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6wNP5v8Bofna59hYRA298AKCNclZ7v3hv8tNGtWYi1CrGGDfpcgCgqeTW CsPNj/rcdaId+ZEzyqdGFN4= =Hnor -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.33.0103271233160.10105-100000>