Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:11:18 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMART Message-ID: <hdh51t$8sh$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <4AFC166B.1040502@andric.com> References: <20091112103308.GA2536@hiMolde.no> <20091112115350.GA18542@icarus.home.lan> <hdguqv$isj$1@ger.gmane.org> <288A7D7F-C247-4493-8ED1-E67FFC3E0201@exscape.org> <hdh0l7$ocv$1@ger.gmane.org> <20091112133221.00006b43@unknown> <hdh2ub$n7$1@ger.gmane.org> <4AFC166B.1040502@andric.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2009-11-12 14:35, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> I've seen it. But I don't remember if they addressed the problem of
>> nonstandard interpretations of statistics?
>
> Note the statistics you quoted are "Vendor Specific SMART Attributes",
> so it is quite logical for different vendors to have different
> statistics. :)
I see your point :)
Though I would hope that a statistics like:
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 087 083 006 Pre-fail Always
- 45398197
would have an equivalent across vendors :) I know, it's too much to ask :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?hdh51t$8sh$1>