Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:42:10 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/icu Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/devel/icu/files patch-enum-bug patch-install patch-intltest patch-putil Message-ID: <1202424131.80678.21.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <200802071738.20992.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> References: <200802070531.m175VikU015939@repoman.freebsd.org> <200802071629.34089.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> <20080208073029.3291b675.nork@FreeBSD.org> <200802071738.20992.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
Mikhail Teterin píše v čt 07. 02. 2008 v 17:38 -0500:
> четвер 07 лютий 2008 05:30 по, Norikatsu Shigemura Ви написали:
> > If library's major version is bumped, all ports depending on it
> > should be bumped PORTREVISION.
>
> Why?
Because you need to force a relink of all applications against the new
library file.
> Why can't the package-building infrastructure put the
> two-and-two together and figure out, that the dependent ports need
> rebuilding /without/ explicit PORTREVISION bump?
Where are the patches?
--
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
And now something completely different.
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD)
iEYEABECAAYFAkeriUIACgkQntdYP8FOsoIfMACgo3V7IHcG62c9lwMHzM+ea1he
vDUAoLT4dZEukbj1Lj45te5s0hIfhq4M
=fvKv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1202424131.80678.21.camel>