Date: Tue, 21 Mar 1995 03:07:36 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" <ache@astral.msk.su> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: /etc/named.boot or /etc/namedb/named.boot? Message-ID: <aL8ZXRlGjE@astral.msk.su> In-Reply-To: <9503201851.AA27463@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>; from Garrett Wollman at Mon, 20 Mar 1995 13:51:08 -0500 References: <AJR7SRlmD8@astral.msk.su> <9503201851.AA27463@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <9503201851.AA27463@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> Garrett
Wollman writes:
><<On Mon, 20 Mar 1995 20:56:43 +0300, "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" <ache@astral.msk.su> said:
>> My named start to fail due to recent /etc/rc changes:
>You should have read the rc files before you installed new ones.
I was looking, but didn't eye-catch such small change.
I don't remember that commit log points about this fact too.
It isn't so-called 'bug report', I just wonder about proper
location of named.boot and doubt that namedb dir is right place.
>The place where we install the default files is /etc/namedb, so for
>most users that is the correct location.
named manpage refers to /etc/named.boot, moreover sources itself
refers to /etc/named.boot.
When named called without -b, it looks /etc/named.boot too.
What is the reason to move it to namedb directory?
--
Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed,
ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead -
FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3 : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead.
RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?aL8ZXRlGjE>