Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:54:16 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doceng@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org, www@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: doceng... Message-ID: <50340388.6@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <D2D15567-9F1A-4640-A4B0-49414063A9C0@FreeBSD.org> References: <50326A70.5020009@FreeBSD.org> <D2D15567-9F1A-4640-A4B0-49414063A9C0@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Em 21-08-2012 21:57, Simon L. B. Nielsen escreveu: > Does that mean that the role of doceng has changed? In the past doceng has not really been involved in stuff like this (as in, it was much more limited what doceng did for doc compared to what portmgr does for ports). If so, the charter should be updated. (and yes, my implicit hint is that I don't see a point in doceng taking on this new role.) Well, the charter says doceng@ is responsible for the toolchain and the correct functioning of doc and www. It's subjective but I think that keeping the toolset modern and up to date with technology is also part of that functioning. And it seems that mostly hrs@ and I are pushing this stuff and I talked mostly to him about this apart from the public discussions so I associated the subject with doceng@. I don't care too much if I do it "individually" or on behalf of doceng, I just want to see progress. :) Gabor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50340388.6>