Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:00:02 GMT From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/166994: m4(1): m4' s eval function ignores documented 2nd and 3rd arguments Message-ID: <201312101700.rBAH026H091762@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR bin/166994; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, tg@gmplib.org Cc: tijl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/166994: m4(1): m4's eval function ignores documented 2nd and 3rd arguments Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:34:51 -0500 To be clear, the 'patched' state means "fixed in HEAD, but fix still needs to be MFC'd". If someone doesn't plan on merging it they mark a bug as "closed", not "patched". That said, it is odd for someone to mark a bug as patched unless they are also assigning it to themselves and assuming responsibility for merging it. Tijl, are you planning on merging the fix to at least stable/9? -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201312101700.rBAH026H091762>