Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 14:23:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.org> To: J.Kois@web.de, murray@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/51658: [PATCH] - PR docs/50665 - fix suggestion Message-ID: <200305042123.h44LNJmt046882@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Synopsis: [PATCH] - PR docs/50665 - fix suggestion State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: murray State-Changed-When: Sun May 4 14:21:03 PDT 2003 State-Changed-Why: Thanks for the submission. An <example> isn't really appropriate for this testimonial either, as it could then show up in the list of examples after the table of contents and the assumption is that it generally provides a procedure that can be followed to accomplish a task. latency was mispelled once in this patch, so I fixed this and simplified the sentence about the bridge adding latency to ping times. I think that is all that is really required now that I think about it. It's a more useful statement than the Pentium 90 numbers that show the latency that was added. It may be up to 24 hours before this change is available on the web site. Thanks! http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=51658
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200305042123.h44LNJmt046882>