Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 06:12:11 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org> Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-user@freefall.freebsd.org, Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/eBones/usr.sbin Makefile src/eBones/usr.sbin/fix_kdb_keys Makefile fix_kdb_keys.c src/eBones/usr.sbin/kdb_edit kdb_edit.c src/eBones/usr.sbin/kdb_init kdb_init.c src/eBones/usr.sbin/kerberos kerberos.c src/eBones/usr.sbin/ksrvutil ksrvutil.c src/eBones README.PATCH Message-ID: <sCByzAnOcM@ache.dialup.ru> In-Reply-To: <199602220158.RAA17939@freefall.freebsd.org>; from "Justin T. Gibbs" at Wed, 21 Feb 1996 17:58:35 -0800 References: <199602220158.RAA17939@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199602220158.RAA17939@freefall.freebsd.org> Justin T. Gibbs
writes:
>>In message <199602220111.RAA15833@freefall.freebsd.org> Justin T. Gibbs
>> writes:
>>
>>>>
>>>>I would say this is a _definite_must_ for 2.1.
>>>>
>>>>M
>>>>
>>>>"Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
>>
>>>Andrey. Wasn't there another patch that I gave you a while back
>>>for kadmind that you committed to -current but not to -stable?
>>>You should bring that in as well.
>>
>>Sorry, I am completely _not_ interested in commiting anything into
>>-stable and not plan to spend even few keystrokes to do it.
>>Feel free to do it by yourself or ask somebody else.
>A great attitude. The problem with someone else doing the integration
>into -stable is that its twice as much work for them since you already
>have a diff file you've brought over to Freefall that will probably
I can resend latest commited diff to you.
>splat directly into -stable without any problems. Can I ask why
>you're so negative about maintaining -stable?
I think that having -stable is equal to weak -current.
-current stays buggy now much more times than in old days.
-stable is weak itself too. I remember too many real bug fixes
never sneaked into -stable from -current.
Moreover, I fear that several nice -current enhancements _never_
be released since releases use -stable.
IMHO, -current must be -stable (commit process can stop for
several days when snapshot is taken) as in good old days.
I don't think I can incline team to kill -stable, but
I can not support it personally at least, it is dead end.
--
Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed,
ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead -
http://dt.demos.su/~ache : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead.
RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?sCByzAnOcM>