Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:36:59 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CPU utilization Message-ID: <evl95h$969$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <461E1D4E.3090806@cisco.com> References: <461E0078.3050001@cisco.com> <20070412114344.G64803@fledge.watson.org> <461E1D4E.3090806@cisco.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC784B5AF6B9F45DB0A8DC81E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Randall Stewart wrote: > a) I must have a lock contention issue on the sending > side. I always wonder how cache trashing influences this kind of performance.=20 If you have the time (it's probably a shot in the dark), can you pin=20 most of the sender side on one CPU and try benchmarking it? --------------enigC784B5AF6B9F45DB0A8DC81E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGHifxldnAQVacBcgRAjrDAKCsxqFK/ZM7XvHQldvm0RtJND1u4ACgl9yt JpXxTMNHkFAAF1zz9RV3e9Q= =fx2h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC784B5AF6B9F45DB0A8DC81E--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?evl95h$969$1>