Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 12:29:38 -0800 (PST) From: alexandr@mail.eecis.udel.edu To: Paolo Di Francesco <paipai@tin.it> Cc: freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: [Ultra] Compiler, again Message-ID: <199811272029.MAA22765@hub.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
In Reply to Your Message of Fri, 27 Nov 1998 19: 40:05 GMT
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 15:29:21 -0500
From: Jerry Alexandratos <alexandr@mail.eecis.udel.edu>
Message-ID: <199811271529.aa17970@mail.eecis.udel.edu>
Paolo Di Francesco <paipai@tin.it> says:
:
: Black-box #1: running on i386, used gcc2.7.2 + toolchain, etc
: Black-box #2: running on i386, used gcc2.8 + ????
: Black-box #3: running on i386, used egcs1.1b + ????
: Black-box #4: running on i386, used gccX.Y.Z and emulator under i386 + Solari
s bin...etc...
: Black-box #5: running on USparc, using gccX.Y.Z
Wouldn't gcc28 be the best way to go? The only reason I say this is
because I thought the decision was made to have that be the eventual
upgrade of our compiler. This would definitely be incentive to push that
project forward.
Why gcc28? This has been discussed ad infinitum and you can search the
list archives for postings by Terry "the man" Lambert for the reasoning
behind gcc28 over egcs.
--Jerry
8) Jerry Alexandratos % - % "Nothing inhabits my (8
8) alexandr@louie.udel.edu % - % thoughts, and oblivion (8
8) darkstar@strauss.udel.edu % - % drives my desires." (8
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199811272029.MAA22765>