Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 05:33:52 +0000 From: Amar Takhar <verm@darkbeer.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of Alder Lake support Message-ID: <20220905053352.GA12178@darkbeer.org> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1tApXqhpWoA1cVbgFUbtFgFL6Ai0bKey-P3vOnGxWP5Gg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAN6yY1t75UEVBK5cnvwmEopCOyKmcOEX3bRJkRnX37kPa2gkgg@mail.gmail.com> <2ba3e191-64c1-b854-3eb3-080345b56839@FreeBSD.org> <20220820181357.GA5624@darkbeer.org> <CAN6yY1vL9hGh3Ggfi8B3wcU24%2BqUSPVaGqsN1v9qxnTqGHqhPg@mail.gmail.com> <20220820184531.GA6367@darkbeer.org> <CAN6yY1tApXqhpWoA1cVbgFUbtFgFL6Ai0bKey-P3vOnGxWP5Gg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2022-09-04 14:49 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 11:45 AM Amar Takhar <verm@darkbeer.org> wrote: > > My Alder Lake has only run CURRENT as it is most likely going to get graphics > support and a fix for hte file system crashes first. Mine is a i9-12900KF so no graphics card to worry about. > Sadly, disabling soft updates does not fix the problem. I got one more VFS > crash after disabling them. Still, a single dump while building around 1000 > ports is a huge improvement! Having soft updates enabled clearly makes the > likelihood of a crash much greater. I have opened ticket 266145 on this problem > if you want to see if this goes anywhere. Since it looks like a mix of > performance and efficiency core will be hte norm from now on from both Intel > and AMD, this clearly will need some attention soon. Yes I had the same issues tonight using CURRENT as well. Disabling soft updates did seem to make it happy for a bit longer but once it hits something on the filesystem it does not like it will consistently crash even across reboots. In both cases it was an rm -rf of a directory with a lot of files (70k). I did update that ticket thanks for opening one. Amar.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20220905053352.GA12178>