Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 02:00:59 +0930 From: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> To: Ernst de Haan <ernst@jollem.com> Cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: JDK ports revisited Message-ID: <20010602020059.A18838@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <20010601104331.A1730@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl>; from ernst@jollem.com on Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 10:43:31AM %2B0200 References: <20010601104331.A1730@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 10:43:31AM +0200, Ernst de Haan wrote: > Following is the suggested short term solution to solving the issues > surrounding our JDK ports. Considering the discussions we had I would like to > make this proposal and I would *really* like to see some feedback, either > positive or negative. [Steps snipped] I think this is a great idea FWIW. To elaborate on a previous question I had. Lets say we are suddenly able to distribute a binary version of the J2SDK (1.2.2 for arguments sake). Is the jdk12 port then replaced by the binary distribution? Would we then create a src-jdk12 (or somesuch) port in case people want to compile it from source? I ask because a binary version may have some functionality missing (e.g. the DPS libraries) that people may want to make their own decision about and compile in. regards, Greg -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Mobile: 0419 868 494 Information Technology Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010602020059.A18838>