Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:12:29 -0400 From: "Michael R. Wayne" <wayne@staff.msen.com> To: FreeBSD ISP List <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: proftpd, mass virtual hosting and symlinks Message-ID: <20030605161229.J90466@staff.msen.com> In-Reply-To: <00b001c32ab1$c602dc00$6b026b83@marco>; from info@kolorbit.com on Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 04:55:44PM %2B0100 References: <20030604143425.GB88470@users.munk.nu> <00b001c32ab1$c602dc00$6b026b83@marco>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 04:55:44PM +0100, Marco Gonçalves wrote: > Use FTP, > > i do virual hosting on my server, and since i use PureFTPd all muy trouble finished We're looking at changing ftpd daemons and would like comments from other ISPs. We have a couple of core requirements that we have not been able to get by with either Pure or Pro to date. - All users have a login account so there's no sql issues. - We need anonymous FTP per domain. All uploaded files which get uploaded via anonymous ftp for a domain need to be owned by a user/group associated with this domain and set in the config file. Obviously, the incoming directory is set to write only. - We also need password protected FTP per domain. The ftp user is always in the same unix group as the main account holder and, once again, uploaded files need to be owned by the associated user/group. Restricted write access is set in config file and real account user has full access rights. Last time we checked, the only thing that did all this was WUFTP. Has this changed? /\/\ \/\/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030605161229.J90466>