Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 19:38:54 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, smp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Releasing interrupts? Message-ID: <200010060138.TAA03855@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 05 Oct 2000 16:08:13 PDT." <20001005160813.R58256@canonware.com> References: <20001005160813.R58256@canonware.com> <XFMail.001005121431.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <200010051918.NAA01346@harmony.village.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In message <20001005160813.R58256@canonware.com> Jason Evans writes: : Good to hear it. With regard to thread cancellation, it's another example : of a feature that, if used, usually indicates poor program design, so I : hope that we don't find a need for kthread_cancel(). Even for the interrupt threads? I'd think you'd want to kill them when their reference count goes to zero. It certainly looks weird in the ps listing to see ed1 on irq 11 when you know you ejected the card... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the messagehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010060138.TAA03855>