Date: 24 Nov 2002 01:59:46 +0000 From: Stacey Roberts <stacey@vickiandstacey.com> To: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> Cc: Lefteris Tsintjelis <lefty@ene.asda.gr>, a <a@grunix.com>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Port INDEX dependency list incompletes Message-ID: <1038103185.43256.78.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <3DE02F83.6050407@owt.com> References: <3DDF911D.5FF8F512@ene.asda.gr> <3DDF9EFC.E3B42B5D@ene.asda.gr> <20021123170312.3af58fdd.a@grunix.com> <3DDFA761.D459E000@ene.asda.gr> <3DDFCA8A.40104@owt.com> <3DDFE0AC.57BF260E@ene.asda.gr> <3DDFE4D6.5090901@owt.com> <1038093287.43256.12.camel@localhost> <3DE02F83.6050407@owt.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Kent, Thanks for that.., I'll keep looking out for some update from the maintainers on some progress to the issues with portsdb -U Regards, Stacey On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 01:46, Kent Stewart wrote: > Stacey Roberts wrote: > > Hi Kent, > > I wanted to square with you that this is as one would expect from > > "make index" and "portsdb -u" at the end of cvsup of ports tree: > > # make index > > Generating INDEX - please wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: > > freeciv-imlib-1.13.0 > > Done. > > #portsdb -u > > [Updating the portsdb <format:bdb1_btree> in /usr/ports ... - 7860 port > > entries found > > .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000........ ..... done] > > # > > > > Is the one warning there about freeciv-imlib-1.13.0 being duplicated > > okay? I ask as this is usually the last entry in my regular portsdb -Uu > > after cvsup'ing ports tree. > > Kris told me that it was because I had imlib installed, which I did. > > I also figured that one message about a port I didn't use was much > better than screens of messages about ports I did use :). > > Kent > > > > > Regards, > > > > Stacey > > > > On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 20:28, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > >>Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote: > >> > >>>Kent Stewart wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>cd /usr/ports > >>>>make index > >>>>portsdb -u > >>> > >>> > >>>I get almost always "dependency list incompletes" with portsdb -Uu. > >>>Would it be a good idea to always use the above instead? > >> > >>No, because portsdb -U uses much less computer time to rebuild INDEX > >>than make index does. On my AMD 2000+ XP, which is designed to do 20 > >>minute buildworlds, a portsdb -U requires ~7 minutes and a make index > >>requires ~11 minutes. If you are going to work on your ports, the > >>extra time is time you just sit there. I find people go into their own > >>version of an idle-loop after 2 minutes. > >> > >>We just have to wait for knu to fix it. > >> > >>KEnt > > -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1038103185.43256.78.camel>