Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:01:36 -0500 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com> To: pav@freebsd.org Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: obsoleteing PORTREVISION bumps (Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/icu) Message-ID: <200802071801.38477.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <1202424131.80678.21.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> References: <200802070531.m175VikU015939@repoman.freebsd.org> <200802071738.20992.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> <1202424131.80678.21.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
четвер 07 лютий 2008 05:42 по, Pav Lucistnik Ви написали: > > Why can't the package-building infrastructure put the > > two-and-two together and figure out, that the dependent ports need > > rebuilding /without/ explicit PORTREVISION bump? > > Where are the patches? Pav, this is insincere. As a portmgr member you know, that I have, in fact, contributed patches. Some of them are even in the bsd.port.mk. With that aside, let's continue... The package-building is in capable hands, I'm sure -- actual patches (implementation) is not the problem. I'm pointing at a /design/ flaw. Pointing it out should be sufficient. Best, -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200802071801.38477.mi%2Bmill>