Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:12:52 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." <mi@aldan.algebra.com> To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> Cc: eivind@dimaga.com, cm@linktel.net, archie@whistle.com, brian@awfulhak.org, net@freebsd.org, suutari@iki.fi Subject: Re: natd slow, eats up an entire CPU... Message-ID: <4ED3C114.3070200@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <20111128052758.GA23803@rdtc.ru> References: <201111272043.pARKh9rZ047643@narawntapu.narawntapu> <20111128052758.GA23803@rdtc.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28.11.2011 00:27, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Do not use natd, use ipfw nat instead - it uses the same libalias
> but completely in kernel and avoids gigantic natd overhead.
I guess, I'll have to research this new method... But I don't recall this being
a problem with FreeBSD-7.x -- are there some known regressions in natd from 8.x?
Thanks!
-mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ED3C114.3070200>