Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:18:04 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com> To: "sbruno@freebsd.org" <sbruno@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: zfs zlib and net/zlib conflict Message-ID: <20121010101804.GA42689@server.rulingia.com> In-Reply-To: <1349818116.35301.9.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> References: <1349723829.90401.2.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> <20121008205543.GE61955@server.rulingia.com> <1349818116.35301.9.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2012-Oct-09 14:28:36 -0700, Sean Bruno <seanbru@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: >I guess the "fastest" solution would be to simply rename functions in >the cddl version of zlibc and update the cddl code appropriately? I'd agree that's the fastest. The downside is that renaming functions in the CDDL source would make it harder to import updates. If this approach was used, it should probably be done using #defines in a header file (along the lines of libc's namespace.h). In the long term, it would be nice to have all zlib consumers share a single zlib (though this would entail non-trivial effort). --=20 Peter Jeremy --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlB1S1wACgkQ/opHv/APuIeoDgCfYmstCNonRxNXiIyoVfvb+mhT 5gIAoLHWcqBZDNG5DGP4cDjku3TMNE6L =RUJA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121010101804.GA42689>