Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:19:42 -0500 (EST)
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Sameh Ghane <sw@anthologeek.net>, iwasaki@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: www/en/releases/5.0R todo.sgml
Message-ID:  <XFMail.20021120121942.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20021120160613.GA43304@anthologeek.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 20-Nov-2002 Sameh Ghane wrote:
> Le (On) Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 04:12:22PM +0100, Ollivier Robert ecrivit (wrote):
>> According to Alfred Perlstein:
>> > kernel: witness and invariants
>> > userland: malloc
>> > 
>> > any others?
>> 
>> Working ACPI ? (although it may be too hard to do fro 5.0-R). Far too many
>> machines have issues with ACPI :-(
> 
> Maybe it's time to import a new snapshot.
> 
> I was getting this error:
> Nov 20 15:14:46 core kernel: acpi0: <GBT    AWRDACPI> on motherboard
> Nov 20 15:14:46 core kernel: ACPI-0467: *** Error: GPE0 block overlaps the GPE1
> block
> Nov 20 15:14:46 core kernel: acpi0: could not enable ACPI: AE_BAD_VALUE
> Nov 20 15:14:46 core kernel: device_probe_and_attach: acpi0 attach returned 6
> 
> and this small patch (from 20021101's snapshot) corrected this behavior:
> --- evevent.c.old       Wed Nov 20 15:49:34 2002
> +++ evevent.c   Wed Nov 20 15:53:34 2002
> @@ -462,9 +462,13 @@
>      {
>          /* Check for GPE0/GPE1 overlap */
>  
> -        if (AcpiGbl_GpeNumberMax >= AcpiGbl_FADT->Gpe1Base)
> +        if ((AcpiGbl_GpeBlockInfo[0].RegisterCount) &&
> +            (AcpiGbl_GpeNumberMax >= AcpiGbl_FADT->Gpe1Base))
>          {
> -            ACPI_REPORT_ERROR (("GPE0 block overlaps the GPE1 block\n"));
> +            ACPI_REPORT_ERROR ((
> +                "GPE0 block (GPE 0 to %d) overlaps the GPE1 block (GPE %d to
> %d)\n",
> +                AcpiGbl_GpeNumberMax, AcpiGbl_FADT->Gpe1Base,
> +                AcpiGbl_FADT->Gpe1Base + (ACPI_MUL_8
> (AcpiGbl_GpeBlockInfo[1].RegisterCount) - 1)));
>              return_ACPI_STATUS (AE_BAD_VALUE);
>          }

Yes, if that bug is fixed we should definitely upgrade to a newer import.
Iwasaki-san, do you think you could do another import prior to RC1?

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20021120121942.jhb>