Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:07:31 +0200 From: fandino <fandino@ng.fadesa.es> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3b7and poor ata performance Message-ID: <41753BC3.80807@ng.fadesa.es> In-Reply-To: <20041019120050.uscwo4c8kco4g44s@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> References: <20041015190638.C5A0E5D04@ptavv.es.net> <41715E7F.7060509@ng.fadesa.es> <20041018100045.f8koww0skcco0woo@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> <4173D66F.6010200@DeepCore.dk> <4173F2E9.7010407@ng.fadesa.es> <417406E3.9010706@DeepCore.dk> <4174FD04.8040000@ng.fadesa.es> <20041019104525.ikgw8kcw8sw480os@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> <20041019155848.GA55255@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041019120050.uscwo4c8kco4g44s@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Kenneth Culver wrote: > Quoting Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>: > >> On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 10:45:25AM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote: >> >>> This is with a custom kernel with all debugging options off. I >>> haven't seen a >>> mail from you yet that says whether you turned off debugging options >>> in the >>> kernel or not, and if you haven't turned off debugging options, I'd >>> strongly >>> suggest doing so. >> >> >> In fact he's said so several times. >> >> Kris > > > OK, well I must've missed it then and I apologize for that, however, I > still > don't see any reason why his hardware would perform so much worse than > mine, > aside from the something being wrong with his hardware setup, or the > driver for > his particular ata chip. If that was so, why OpenBSD, Linux (and windows) outperform FreeBSD? They are almost two times faster than FBSD, using the same hardware.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41753BC3.80807>