Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 06:03:04 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabextract Makefile ports/archivers/dact Makefile ports/archivers/star Makefile ports/archivers/arj Makefile ports/archivers/tardy ... Message-ID: <200504120603.10518.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200504110804.j3B84fNs060515@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200504110804.j3B84fNs060515@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Monday, 11. April 2005 10:04, David E. O'Brien wrote: > Log: > Assist getting more ports working on AMD64 by obeying the > Ports Collection documentation and use 'ARCH' rather than 'MACHINE_ARCH'. The porter's handbook, section 5.11 has an example that uses MACHINE_ARCH, which is the template for a lot of MACHINE_ARCH usage in ports, including a few places your commit missed, like bsd.gnome.mk, bsd.kde.mk, bsd.gnustep.mk and, most importantly, bsd.port.subdir.mk and bsd.port.mk itself (for setting CONFIGURE_TARGET(!)). I'm not familiar with the crossbuilding logic in FreeBSD, so could somebody who is make a definitive statement which of the two variables is crossbuild-safe and then proceed to change the respective bits in the porter's handbook and bsd.port.mk accordingly? -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCW0h+Xhc68WspdLARAlLWAKCCsnC7or/A6qU8br2+jkUzhi6ISACcDGVm ZnRTMgD6O+YcRxU04VAyALc= =T9Nr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200504120603.10518.michaelnottebrock>