Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:00:17 GMT From: "Li-Lun \"Leland\" Wang" <llwang@infor.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/138672: ISO 3166 call Taiwan a wrong name, please call Taiwan "Taiwan" as before. Message-ID: <200909110800.n8B80Heh091703@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR conf/138672; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Li-Lun \"Leland\" Wang" <llwang@infor.org> To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: conf/138672: ISO 3166 call Taiwan a wrong name, please call Taiwan "Taiwan" as before. Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:23:03 +0000 While we follow ISO3166, ISO themselves have said many times (in responding to Taiwan's request to change the country name in ISO3166) that the ISO3166 standard defines only the "country codes," not the "country names." SVN rev 189767 was intended to use "official English short country names." However, since ISO3166 does not define country names, the only thing official in ISO3166 are the country codes. The official name of a country should be up to the people of that country, not ISO or UN or anyone else. If we need another "official" source of country names, check out for example the CIA world factbook: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/tw.html . The conventional short form of the country name is listed as Taiwan in there. CIA is at least a real government entity, while ISO is not. Since there are multiple "official" sources of country names, we should at least choose one that the people of the country in question prefers. After all, where we use the country names (e.g. in sysinstall menu), is meant for the users in that country to recognize and choose. Why should someone in another country care what some other country is called anyway? -- llwang
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200909110800.n8B80Heh091703>