Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 15:21:52 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Rob <spamrefuse@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw man pages vs. 5.3-Stable; needs modification! Message-ID: <20040919122152.GA96753@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <414CF555.2090209@yahoo.com> References: <414CF555.2090209@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 11:56:21AM +0900, Rob wrote: >=20 > Hello, >=20 > The manpages of ipfw needs modification with respect to > the IPFW vs.IPFW2 discussion. > All this is quite misleading when 5.3 becomes stable. >=20 Do you mean you want the IPFW vs. IPFW2 information to be removed from the manpage? If yes, I don't support this. There will be a lot of people switching from 4.x to 5.x, and it can be helpful for them. We can remove this in future releases though. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBTXngqRfpzJluFF4RAkXgAJ9QibKRJcBqmPDAmgESf/TJB7lteACfbbyO mkChAcyMLqdndq5WL68Hvlc= =TDlF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040919122152.GA96753>