Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:10:54 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> To: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD <peter.harrison@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -DNOPROFILE with make buildworld... Message-ID: <20050622091054.GA34367@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <D8E3EB52364A0842A853E0944FD390D93176DE@DMM00022.link2.gpn.gov.uk> References: <D8E3EB52364A0842A853E0944FD390D93176DE@DMM00022.link2.gpn.gov.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 09:46:11AM +0100, Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:cswiger@mac.com] > > Sent: 21 June 2005 19:25 > > To: Roland Smith > > Cc: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: -DNOPROFILE with make buildworld... > > [snip] > > > Normally, you don't use the profiled versions of libraries > > unless you are > > running a binary which links against them. If you are > > running a binary which > > has not been compiled with profiling, the toolchain will link > > it against normal > > versions of the libraries. > > > Most of the apps I'm running have been compiled from ports against > the stock 5.3-RELEASE libraries. Are the stock libraries profiling or > not? No. > Would I have had to explicitly set an option to compile ports to > link against profiling libraries? Yes. > Is it therefore a reasonable > assumption that if I didn't specifically make any binaries profiling, > then they'll be not-profiling? Yes. -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050622091054.GA34367>