Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:10:54 -0500 From: "Josh Carroll" <josh.carroll@gmail.com> To: "Matt Fioravante" <fmatthew5876@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing ports to /usr Message-ID: <8cb6106e0711141110j61dcd607m9c2b059d80239c80@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3eca10930711141005m5ceb5d8bve7a1b6f235057342@mail.gmail.com> References: <3eca10930711141005m5ceb5d8bve7a1b6f235057342@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Would there be any negative ramifications to installing ports in /usr > instead of /usr/local? Like could they potentially clobber system > binaries and other files or is this pretty safe to do? More importantly, why do you want/need to do this? I personally like the separation of world and ports. It keeps things nice and tidy, and that's I'm sure a major reason why it was done that way (obviously, clobbering things in /usr is the main reason). Josh
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8cb6106e0711141110j61dcd607m9c2b059d80239c80>