Date: 14 Jun 2001 13:50:53 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>, Jens Schweikhardt <schweikh@schweikhardt.net>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdio printf.3 Message-ID: <xzpg0d3fffm.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106141040580.71865-100000@besplex.bde.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106141040580.71865-100000@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> writes: > -pedantic causes warnings about "long long", not about %ll. Yes it does. > These warnings > are correct. "long long doesn't exist in ISO C (C90). When gcc supports > C99, it should have separate -iso^Wansi and -pedantic flags for C90 and C99. > Of course, C99 features shouldn't be used until it becomes unnecessary to > support C90 compilers. The "long long" misfeature should never be used. Gcc has a command-line option (-std) for selecting the standard to apply, and claims to support ISO C99, but incorrectly prints these warnings even when ISO C99 is selected. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpg0d3fffm.fsf>