Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:58:44 -0000 From: Kelsey Cummings <kgc@microshaft.org> To: pf4freebsd@freelists.org Subject: [pf4freebsd] Re: Problem with ftp-proxy. Message-ID: <3FE3BCD2.8000405@microshaft.org> In-Reply-To: <3FE281C7.2000204@dequim.ist.utl.pt> References: <20031203113200.780a87da.matteo.niccoli@finsystem.net> <20031203170735.GM14907@zot.electricrain.com> <3FE27676.1080607@microshaft.org> <3FE281C7.2000204@dequim.ist.utl.pt>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruno Afonso wrote: >Kelsey Cummings wrote: > > =20 > >>Gregory P. Smith wrote: >> >> >> =20 >> >>>These are my rules that work for ftp proxy on my nat+firewall system. >>> >>> >>> =20 >>> >>Just out of curiosity, anyone have the FTP proxy working on a bridgemod= e=20 >>firewall? I *just can't* get it to work right, even on my OpenBSD=20 >>firewall. >> =20 >> > >If you're bridging, you do not have ips, so it does not make sense to=20 >use a proxy. > I should probably clarify that it's bridging and routing. I have a /29 briged and a /28 routed via my DSL circuit. Strange, but I=20 work for the ISP that I get the service from. The reasons for having this is that my workstations go on the bridged=20 IPs to allow for Multicast reception, sourcing on them. I've yet to=20 find a IGMP proxy for unix that is functional, otherwise everything=20 would live on the routed block. (Which right now is unused.) The 'wan' IP of my firewall is the first of the bridged IPs bound to=20 dc0, my workstation, the second, out dc1 via bridge group of dc0 and dc1 I'd hoped to be able to use the ftp proxy from my workstations so as to=20 not have to open the backchannels, etc. -K
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FE3BCD2.8000405>