Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 13:18:21 -0500 (CDT) From: "Lars Fredriksen" <fredriks@mcs.com> To: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes) Cc: rkw@dataplex.net, phk@freefall.cdrom.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Version numbers of the different branches? Message-ID: <m0sWpJd-0003l2C@mercury.mcs.com> In-Reply-To: <199507091817.LAA09455@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Jul 9, 95 11:17:39 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rodney W. Grimes writes:
>
> >
> > >("BUILT-950703" ? Hey, He hasn't got the "ls -s panic" patch that
> > >got comitted on july 5th !)
> >
> > "BUILT-950708" -- Does he have it?
> >
> > IMHO, "2.1d0803" where 0803 represents the CTM update level
> > or "2.1d950706" where that represents the date of the source file sup
> > would be more useful.
>
> A) assumes he is using CTM, B) assumes he is using sup, neither may
> be true (and is certainly not true for me, along with 32 other folks
> that I know of).
>
>
>
Can't we come up with a mechanism where cvs does this for us? What if
a cvs commit on file xyz also fires off a script to update the RELEASE_DATE
in the top level makefile? (Obviously one have to avoid recursion here :-))
Lars
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Lars Fredriksen fredriks@mcs.com (home)
lars@fredriks.pr.mcs.net (home-home)
fredriks@asiago.cs.wisc.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m0sWpJd-0003l2C>