Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 14:43:51 +0000 From: "Piotr P. Stefaniak" <pstef@freebsd.org> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 62d42655bca1 - main - usb(4): Substitute "unsigned int" using the equivalent and shorter "unsigned" keyword. Message-ID: <Y0A7J8vyMhZgr1XC@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <bf9cae46-5d31-e676-2640-c6b49cfdd902@selasky.org> References: <202210071141.297BfcjN071407@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <Y0ASC9OXKP19xkSz@freefall.freebsd.org> <d7d3b1ef-1afe-bb84-d61c-031b3dff94c2@selasky.org> <Y0AnxWRAH7detuol@freefall.freebsd.org> <bf9cae46-5d31-e676-2640-c6b49cfdd902@selasky.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2022-10-07 16:21:01, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >Would uint32_t be more clear? I don't disagree with the style change to the point that I demand it be corrected, please keep it the way it is now to avoid more churn. I just opposed the more general idea that this is an improvement. I say it's debatable, at least until we have style.9 rule one way or the other.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Y0A7J8vyMhZgr1XC>