Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 03:29:22 +0900 From: ARIGA Seiji <say@sfc.wide.ad.jp> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: lconrad@Go2France.com, kris@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPsec Performance (Re: Merge of KAME code) Message-ID: <20000713032922M.say@decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <20000713022715E.say@decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20000711174522.03075a20@mail.Go2France.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007111506110.88886-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000713022715E.say@decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000 02:27:15 +0900,
ARIGA Seiji <say@sfc.wide.ad.jp> wrote,
: : > Has anybody benchmarked or simulated how many tunnels and bits/sec one
: : > software-only FreeBSD IPsec server can support?
: : My P120 can do about 2.5MBps :-)
: I used to benchmarked IPsec performance on following platform with netperf.
: - PentiumIII 500MHz
: - 256MB Memory
: - Intel Ether Express Pro 100 (100Mbps)
: - FreeBSD 2.2.8
: - KAME 19990809 stable
Ah, I told a lie, sorry.
I used two clients and one router.
client - router - client
Above is a router spec. Client (IPsec machine) spec is,
- PentiumII 450MHz
- 128MB Memory
- Intel Ether Express Pro 100 (100Mbps)
- FreeBSD 2.2.8
- KAME 19990809 stable
I used static IPsec configuration (No IKE).
// ARIGA Seiji
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000713032922M.say>