Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 17:32:29 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: Philip Paeps <philip@paeps.cx> Cc: "FreeBSD-Current (E-mail)" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Plea for base system trim Message-ID: <20030305173053.S50404@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz> In-Reply-To: <20030306010724.GE621@juno.home.paeps.cx> References: <2F03DF3DDE57D411AFF4009027B8C36704129AE6@exchange-uk.isltd.insignia.com> <20030305015947.M18288@znfgre.tberna.bet> <20030305232641.GC621@juno.home.paeps.cx> <20030305163732.Y50404@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz> <20030306010724.GE621@juno.home.paeps.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Philip Paeps wrote:
> > That way, both named and ndc "see" the same picture of the system, in and
> > out of the chroot tree.
>
> Speaking of ndc, I think that's a BIND8-ism.
Not _exactly_ true, but yes, ndc is what you use to manage BIND 8. All
comparisons to tools that you may or may not use to manage future versions
of BIND are apples and oranges.
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030305173053.S50404>