Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 21:02:16 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, gerald@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bug in 6.x' C++ compiler Message-ID: <20061012180216.GN60834@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <200610121236.42669.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> References: <200610111322.57735.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <20061012095414.GM60834@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <200610121236.42669.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:36:42PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29390 > > четвер 12 жовтень 2006 05:54, Kostik Belousov написав: > > Thread model: posix > > gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305 > > > opt/gcc-3.4.6 is the stock version of the 3.4.6 built directly from the FSF > > sources (relatively long time ago). > > Well, if the stock gcc-3.4.6 does not have the problem, but FreeBSD's version > does, then finding the guilty diff would not be hard. In fact, the absence of that symbol in the code generated by differently configured gcc means nothing. After I noted that, I did rebuilt the icu with that compiler, and with march=pentium4 & -O0 it built and tested normally. I think that this is actually some change in the configuration (and binutils version it was configured with) that matters. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFLoMoC3+MBN1Mb4gRAjaPAKCuxj+5Qm4w8hRqODTmQxoVbjVrhACbBPhZ zx06qyTwTA/ay6tvFasJZEI= =EHRC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061012180216.GN60834>